OBSERVATIONS
Having done the numerology of my own and two deceased family members’ fadic years, using all three fadic year formulas, recurrent, progressive, and progressive-reductive, I arrived at the following observations:
- They can be the year before or after something important happens, not just the year when something important happens. Gibson said to allow up to a year before or after a fadic year for something significant to happen. He explained it this way; a baby is experiencing its first year of life after it’s born, but we don’t call it one year old until that year has elapsed. So when the baby is actually experiencing his or her second year of life, we consider the child to be a one-year-old. Under all three fadic-year formulas, I found a number of my fadic years fell the year before an important life change occurred.
- Often the fadic year will manifest itself as a gain or advancement of some kind. This can represent the culmination of developments over the period of time since the previous fadic year in a person’s life.
- Fadic years can also be marked by a significant loss. It’s a sad fact. As I looked over my fadic years, a few of them were marked by a significant loss. But as writer Judith Viorst pointed out in her book Necessary Losses, there are some losses in life we must experience in order to learn, change and grow.
- A fadic year can also—possibly–indicate the year of a death. It doesn’t have to, but it may. Be prepared for that. I contemplated not mentioning this. But Gibson brought up this disturbing possibility when he detailed the fadic years of some illustrious British Army officer. Using the recurrent formula, he showed how this worthy officer moved from strength to strength over the course of his army career. In another fadic year which should’ve been marked by an even-greater accomplishment for this officer, the ship on which he was traveling to take up his next command was sunk by an enemy submarine, thus violently ending his cycle of fadic years. Both the progressive and progressive-reductive formulas picked up on the year one of my deceased relatives died, but not at all for the other relative. So this observation is hit-or-miss.
Another Epic Discovery
As I looked over the lists of my own fadic years, I realized that in the case of my past fadic years, the single digit to which those years reduced, reflected a numerological significance relevant to the key event which happened those years. With that in mind, here is my run-down of the nine primary numbers, plus the master numbers 11 and 22, and what they might mean in terms of your fadic year: